Doubts and Demons

Upon reflection, it was the doctrine of Hell which initially lead me to my Agnostic perspective. Ironic isn’t it?  For there are those who would conclude that my Agnostic perspective will ultimately lead me to Hell……

Perhaps they are right.

But I doubt it.

Recently, I was speaking with  one of my nearest and dearest friends regarding my “change of beliefs” over the course of the past few years .  Like myself, he was raised in the fundamentalist Christian Church known commonly as the Church of Christ.  In the course of our conversation, I referenced my peaceful perspective that there is no Hell.

His response intrigued me.  He said something along the lines that he never gave Hell much thought.  That he focused more on what affects life in the here and the now (I am admittedly paraphrasing to a point).  In this regard, my dear friend represents the best of the Christian community.  For in terms of practicalities, my dear friend  is as much of a humanist as any person with whom I am acquainted.

Which leads me to question my own perspective during those many years of professed and practiced Christianity.

My perspective on the matter of the Bible was cut and dried, clear and to the point.  Hell was Hell.  God was God.  God spoken Creation in 6 days was actually God spoken Creation in 6 days.  The miraculous conception of a Virgin was actually a miraculous conception of a Virgin. The Bible was the inerrant, fully inspired Word of God.

There was no doubt in my mind.

And since I was so convinced that the Bible was the actual Word of God, then I was convinced that preparing for life after death was all that mattered.  Which ultimately meant that life after death was all that truly mattered.  And when assessed and deliberated, that meant that avoiding an existence of eternal torture in Hell was all that truly mattered.  At least that was how I assessed life during my days as a Christian.

Now, I do not presume to speak for Christians in general on the matter.  Perhaps other Christians view the matter differently.  I can only speak for myself.  But with all my heart, and in all sincerity, I can truly say that my perspective during my many years as a Christian was based upon a fundamental fear of Hell.  And that fear of eternal damnation I extended to my loved ones, for who would not fear such on behalf of family and friends, if one fears such on behalf of self?  Quite frankly,  that fundamental fear shaped and molded my perspective as a Christian.

Perhaps had I been like my dear friend who professes and practices Christianity without focusing on the alleged life hereafter, I too would still be “in the church”.

For whatever reason, my fundamentalist thinking as a Christian would not allow me to advance beyond “either/or” reasoning.

Thus, it seems to me that either the Bible is the fully inspired Word of God, or it is merely the product of the human mind.

In other words, myths and legends relative to one particular peoples’ early history.

That history likewise recorded from a biased perspective; as are most autobiographies.

It further seems to me that either there is a personal God who dwells in another realm, or there is no other realm at all.

And hence no Heaven.

And hence no Hell.

Could I be wrong?  I suppose.

Does it  matter?  I doubt it.

For quite frankly, I doubt many things.

Except what my dear friend, the Christian with the humanistic perspective observed:

The here and the now is all that matters.


5 thoughts on “Doubts and Demons

  1. The Bible actually says very little about Hell. If you compare with, say, the Koran, where Hell, flames, and eternal torment are there about 10 times every page, the relative absence in the Bible is striking. Its just not something the writers wish to focus on.

    Your either / or mentality is rather strange. The Bible never actually claims anywhere to be the inerrant, divinely inspired Word of God. It does seem however for the most part to have been carefully thought through by the writers who were certainly not casual in their approach. Why do you say MERELY THE PRODUCT OF THE HUMAN MIND? Why MERELY? As if I were to say that Einstein/s Theory of Relativity was merely the product of a human mind. Relativity is, clearly, the product of a human mind, but hardly less worthy or useful for all that.

    • I tend to agree that my either/or mentality is rather strange.

      But such was the perspective with which I was conditioned growing up in the church of Christ. And I continued to contition myself thusly as an adult with daily prayer, Bible study, and weekly worship with the church of Christ.

      In my world:

      Either you were saved or you were lost.
      Either you go to heaven or you go to hell.
      Either the Bible is the fully inspired word of God (the references I recall which the church of Christ rely on to support such an ideology are 2 Tim 2:15; 3:16; and 1 Thess 2; somewhere around vss 13,14 or so) or it is “merely” the product of humankind.

      Now, I agree wholeheartedly with your observation of “merely” as seeming to slight humankind. I referenced such from the perspective of my past and my admittedly conditioned ideology.

      Actually, when considered from the perspective of being “merely” the product of humanity, the Bible is actually an amazing piece of literature. So many different writings, carefully patched together to market as a single product, and then quite efficiently marketed to sell what I believeto be an empty product. The Bible in this context is a work in progress. At least so far as the utility thereof to meet a variety of interests is concerned.

      Thanks for your comments my friend.

      Davey Lee (Dave Henderson)

  2. I resonate with what you’ve said here. And I think excessive focus on the hereafter was what writers like Paul had in mind.

    Being a good devout Christian is unfortunately not the same thing as being a good person.

  3. We need to start with objectivity, an objective assessment of the facts. After that we have to gradually over time bring our subjective feelings into line with that reality. The verses from Thess and Timothy, taken together, are totally pathetic as evidence of verbal inerrancy. They just don’t say what people use them to say. The only reason they are quoted is because there are no better ones.
    I’m much more impressed by e.g. Luke 1.1-4, where he effectively says, my book is a result of careful research. Not a shred or suggestion of direct divine input into the writing process. But stuff like this gets ignored by people whose minds are already made up.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s